A contract you ratify by action rather than signature is called a contract of adhesion. This type of consent is not enforceable in Alabama but is everywhere else. Simple use of the software is acceptance of the contract since that is how it is defined. A signature is not required in 49 states. What's unity gonna do, write them a letter asking for a made up amount of money based on nothing they ever signed? I'm not going to be the guy who tells you not to speak up if you don't know what you're talking about, but you shouldn't talk so definitively without a significant background in contractual law. Terrible PR move, but the contract itself was modifiable unilaterally. Its how WOTC was able to retroactively modify OGL. You can if the contract says you can, which is done all the time. Opinions? WOTC, if you're reading this, do you have any comments? Shutter it? Not likely since this is a huge cash cow for them. So if the dev outcry doesn't make Unity backpedal on this, how do you think Hasbro's going to deal with it? Move everything to UE5? That'll take more dev work. We know how much Hasbro hates investing money in making MTGA better (just look at the glacial pace of QoL improvements over the past five years), so it's not likely that they're going to be willing to pay 1 to 10 cents for an installation. This includes re-installations and even simple downloads for free-to-play/freemium games. Unity Personal and Unity Plus devs will have to pay $.20 for every game installed past their subscription-specific thresholds, Unity Pro devs will have to fork over between $.02 and $.15 for every install past theirs, and Unity Enterprise devs’ costs range from $.01 to $.125.
0 kommentar(er)
